Karlstack has obtained a leaked document that shows a professor of political science at Harvard allegedly fabricated data in order to prove that white people feel threatened by minorities. This leaked report was brought forward as a complaint in 2018 against Harvard professor Ryan Enos by an anonymous complainant whose identity is is protected by The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
I suspect this will all be swept under rug by Harvard and further discussion of it stigmatized as “toxic.” The professor will suffer no serious consequences, certainly nothing like being stripped of tenure. Why? Because his work was politically useful, and protecting him is also politically useful.
It is one of the reasons why "science" has been in the dump with all the research manipulations to get the expected results (i. e. p-hacking.) They estimated about 75% of the social science researches cannot replicate, and a scarier thing is about 1/3 of the hard science. It is why people should always take any "studies" with a grain of salt, and do your own research. I get it; it takes time.
Racial threat theory has been around for a long time and is nothing like CRT. It does not claim that whites everywhere and all the time are threated by blacks and it is empirically testable. To wit, Enos tested it and had to fabricate data to support his hypotheses.
I don’t want to talk to blacks, work with blacks or live near blacks because of what I see in the media. Luckily, I don’t have to. I feel sorry for those who have no choice.
Just another useful idiot; blindly, willingly serving this nation's corporate oligarchy pretending to be an authority on equity. How transparent is their hatred of people.
Well, I DO trust Harvard's ruling class as much as I trust our DC ruling class to do the right thing - meaning the lawful, noble, good for our Nation thing.
Report shows Harvard professors are left-wing racist idiots based on decades of irrefutable facts.
I suspect this will all be swept under rug by Harvard and further discussion of it stigmatized as “toxic.” The professor will suffer no serious consequences, certainly nothing like being stripped of tenure. Why? Because his work was politically useful, and protecting him is also politically useful.
It is one of the reasons why "science" has been in the dump with all the research manipulations to get the expected results (i. e. p-hacking.) They estimated about 75% of the social science researches cannot replicate, and a scarier thing is about 1/3 of the hard science. It is why people should always take any "studies" with a grain of salt, and do your own research. I get it; it takes time.
You have to be the village idiot to trust or even remotely believe any work that comes out of Harvard.
Sums up the Demise of the Ivy League! $150K/Yr for Garbage Science and Research! The entire belief and Political Science are also based on Mega-Lies!
Wait! Stop the PRESSES! A Harvard prof lied about racial data to prove Whites bad... In other news, water is wet.
Racial threat theory has been around for a long time and is nothing like CRT. It does not claim that whites everywhere and all the time are threated by blacks and it is empirically testable. To wit, Enos tested it and had to fabricate data to support his hypotheses.
Leftists...."the ends justify the means."
Non gentiles are insufferable
This provides important context: https://jessesingal.substack.com/p/how-not-to-cover-a-social-science
I don’t want to talk to blacks, work with blacks or live near blacks because of what I see in the media. Luckily, I don’t have to. I feel sorry for those who have no choice.
Just another useful idiot; blindly, willingly serving this nation's corporate oligarchy pretending to be an authority on equity. How transparent is their hatred of people.
Well, I DO trust Harvard's ruling class as much as I trust our DC ruling class to do the right thing - meaning the lawful, noble, good for our Nation thing.
disgusting leftist,....undoubtedly a pervert, and more than likely a pedo.
Here is another Harvard associated study with a change in their 2014 findings based on what the reporting states is new data. Is the data really new? If it is just new to the authors rather than newly available. should it have been considered way back in 2014 rather than now? https://www.wfae.org/race-equity/2022-03-01/updated-chetty-study-data-paints-a-surprising-picture-of-economic-mobility-in-mecklenburg-county
interesting read, thanks for sharing